Schedule (topic flow)
A 15-week pacing plan — Blackboard is authoritative for dates and deadlines
This is a pacing plan, not a calendar. It shows the order in which the methods unfold and roughly when, so you can read ahead and see how the pieces connect. It is not the authoritative calendar: exact dates, deadlines, and any mid-term adjustments live in Blackboard (the LMS), which is authoritative. A few fixed semester dates are noted below for orientation only — confirm everything against Blackboard.
The course runs fifteen weeks in four parts. Every week is one pass through the same analysis blueprint — ask the question, read the data structure, choose the method, check assumptions, report the estimate with its uncertainty, and draw a conclusion that keeps statistical significance, practical significance, and causation distinct. The methods change week to week; the six-step move does not. Each part below lists its weeks, the theme for each week, and the throughline — the question that carries the week. The theme links to that week’s note.
This is a draft course site: the example numbers in the linked notes come from one synthetic world (the Cypress Ridge College Student-Success Study, generated with set.seed(35203)) and are provisional and unverified — they illustrate the reasoning, not real findings.
Part I — Questions, structure, and the estimate (Weeks 1–3)
We set the frame the whole course runs on: turn a vague question into a sharp statistical one, read the data structure that decides the method, and learn to report an estimate with its uncertainty instead of a bare verdict. No named test is the point yet — the blueprint is.
| Week | Theme | The throughline |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Statistical questions, data structure & applied workflow | Are we comparing, explaining, or predicting — and what is the unit, the response, and the design? |
| 2 | Exploratory analysis & graphical comparison | What do we see in the data — its shape, spread, and group differences — before we fit anything? |
| 3 | Estimation, uncertainty & practical significance | What does the analysis estimate, how uncertain is it, and is the effect big enough to matter? |
Note: Labor Day (Mon, Sep 7) falls in Week 3 — no class that Monday, so the week runs Wednesday and Friday (compressed).
Part II — Comparing groups: means, factors, and assumptions (Weeks 4–9)
The core of the course. We work through comparisons of growing structure — paired, two-group, many-group, and two-factor — and on the way learn to check what each method assumes, control error rates across multiple comparisons, and read an interaction. Every method is one instance of the blueprint, never a standalone recipe.
| Week | Theme | The throughline |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | One-sample & paired comparisons | When each unit is its own control, how does pairing remove between-unit variation — and what do we estimate? |
| 5 | Two-group comparisons | With independent groups, what is the mean difference, its interval, and why is this only an association? |
| 6 | Many-group comparisons & one-way ANOVA | When several group means differ, how does ANOVA test them together, and what does \(F\) actually compare? |
| 7 | Assumptions, diagnostics & the midterm | What does the model assume, how do we check it, and what do we do with an outlier we shouldn’t auto-delete? |
| 8 | Multiple comparisons & planned contrasts | Once ANOVA is significant, which means differ — and how do we ask without inflating the error rate? |
| 9 | Two-way ANOVA & interaction | With two factors, when is an effect conditional — and why do we read the interaction before the main effects? |
Note: the midterm is Friday, Oct 9 (in class), during Week 7. It covers the applied workflow, exploratory analysis, estimation and uncertainty, practical significance, and the comparisons through assumptions and diagnostics — Weeks 1–7. No graded content appears on this public site — see Blackboard.
Part III — Models, covariates, and categorical outcomes (Weeks 10–13)
We turn to models that explain and adjust. Regression introduces the partial (adjusted) slope; ANCOVA brings the same adjustment idea to group comparisons; then the outcome itself goes categorical — contingency tables and logistic regression for a binary result. The recurring thread is confounding → adjustment → association vs causation: adjusting for a covariate changes the estimate, and observational data still buy only association.
| Week | Theme | The throughline |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | Simple & multiple regression review | What does a slope estimate, and why does it change once we hold other variables fixed (the partial slope)? |
| 11 | ANCOVA & adjustment | How do we compare group means at the same baseline by adjusting for a covariate — and what must hold? |
| 12 | Categorical outcomes & contingency tables | When the outcome is a category, how do we measure and test association — risk difference, relative risk, odds? |
| 13 | Logistic regression for binary outcomes | How does a model on the log-odds scale give an odds ratio and a predicted probability — and why isn’t OR an RR? |
Note: fall break is Nov 22–28 (no classes), falling between Weeks 13 and 14.
Part IV — Reporting and synthesis (Weeks 14–15)
We bring it together: take one dataset end-to-end through the blueprint and write an honestly-bounded report, then step back and see the whole course as one repeated move across the five data structures.
| Week | Theme | The throughline |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Applied analysis report workshop | How do you carry a real analysis from question to conclusion and report the estimate, the uncertainty, and the limits? |
| 15 | Applied methods synthesis & review | How did one blueprint generate the paired \(t\), ANOVA, regression, ANCOVA, chi-square, and logistic regression? |
Note: the last class is Mon, Dec 7 (the Week 15 synthesis meeting), the consultation day is Dec 8, and the final-exam window is Dec 9–15 (the exact block is set via Blackboard).
Again: this page is a pacing plan to help you read ahead and see where the course is going. For the real calendar — every date, every deadline, the midterm and final blocks, and any adjustment during the term — Blackboard (the LMS) is authoritative. If this page and Blackboard ever disagree, follow Blackboard.